Consider the source...

Ok, after the 125,245th random invite, I simply have to vent. What is it with the women on this site and the bloody cock-worship?

Yeah, yeah, straight girls are straight which means ladies and ladies, that they like penis. I get it. That's all well and fine. This isn't me trying to convert anyone and I'm not trying to dictate profile content. I mean, I'm sure many may find my profile content disturbing. I just have a gripe. For all the random invites I get from women who's profiles I check out that happen to have uploaded vids, WHY, oh why is it always a blowjob? I mean considering I'M the one noting the complaint...it doesn't account for much. I'm hardly the intended audience.(It's like an adult complaining that Transformers 4 wasn't a quality film when the target audience is c***dren, FFS) And aside from general principle, I don't really give half a damn. But I am legitimately curious. Of all the thumbnails of all the self-uploads from females I've seen, not ONCE was there an inclusion of cunnilingus.

Exhibit A. This is an image demonstrating my willingness to display my penchant for receiving oral pleasure:

Exhibit B. This is an image demonstrating my willingness to display my penchant for giving oral pleasure.:

Yes, it's a pretty bad joke, but you get the point. It seems the women here are only concerned with pleasing and not having the act reciprocated. And that...bothers me. Simply because it furthers the whole "women live just to serve men" or "a man's needs is more important" crap. Which, hey if that's your thing, cool. I understand the concept. But it REALLY tarnishes the already broken perception of women and their willingness to seek their own pleasure, ESPECIALLY from men. It just seems SO one-sided. WHY can't more profiles show both? Why can there be just as much priority on showing you want to receive as well? And considering most of the men on this site treat all women as cum-sluts, whores, and bitches anyway....well. If one were to gauge these profiles as a valid indication(which would admittedly be retarted, but still...)one would think that the only women who actually like(or actually do) receiving oral pleasure...are women who like other women... Yet, why do I even care? Not my problem right? Not so much. How women are perceived does matter to me, even on something as trivial as a porn site, because it does account for more than people think. But again, the vids aren't for me and I'm not trying to sway any one's opinion or uploading habits...I just don't get it...like at all....

Second genuine curiosity...why are the female and male profiles identical? You go to males profiles and it's full of cocks ejaculating everywhere(which...probably means more than most are willing to let on...), and you go to a female's profile...and it's the same. Sure there's exceptions, and many are unconvincing fakes...but there's always exclusions. But you can count on your hand the number of female avatars that consist of depicting a man going down on a women. They instead harbor tons of the opposite. And again...I just don't understand why so many women focus so much more on a man receiving pleasure than themselves. Sometimes you do see a woman being orally pleased on a female profile...but 9/10 it's a lesbian gif and the women is straight. I know b/g porn has a stark emphasis on pretty much catering to the male's perspective, and the women is just a vessel present for his pleasure, so I know males preforming cunnilingus is a rarity in those scenes, but it's not a complete non-occurrence...All off the random profiles I stumble on not ONCE have I seem a women lament some shrine of women being pleased orally unless it's lesbian sex, but there's female profiles with blowjobs plastered all over the place.

And yet again to be clear, I do get it. Some are certainly fakes and the women are actually heterosexual... and just really LOVE fellatio and they want to show that. Duh. But it's a really bad, self-limiting look when that's ALL you represent, IMO. ALL that being said considering my sexuality....I really have no say in the matter, and the profiles aren't meant to attract me, regardless. They're for dudes. I'm not xham profile police and my validation is moot. And most just don't give a damn what other people think of THEIR own personal sex profile. I know I don't. Hey it's a porn site...who cares? Why am I over-analyzing? Honestly I should probably mind my own damn business. So, if there's nothing but dick all over your wall, then don't send me a fucking invite because it's goddamn annoying....

Good day.

Published by Thelambofdeth

10 years ago

Comments

Please or to post comments

Thelambofdeth Publisher 10 years ago

to HaloINSummer : ...I really do appreciate the comment (despite your disgusting and stereotypical avatar) but it's way too much for me to realistically respond to. For the most part it seem you're just trying to make excuses for men because how much they need "cocksmiths" and "sluts" and be PC with blanket statements about "progression" and how far we've come, which is quite easy for a white, straight man or (to a much lesser extent) woman in the US who well...gets a pretty fair shake in most things and faces no adversity. But of course, I'm just another hateful, ignorant feminist and I'm simply making things up. Men are saints, and I should shut up and worship them like the rest...I keep getting that memo.

Also, "Gandhi believed Indian women who were raped lost their value as human beings. He argued that fathers could be justified in killing daughters who had been sexually assaulted for the sake of family and community honour. He moderated his views towards the end of his life. But the damage was done, and the legacy lingers in every present-day Indian press report of a rape victim who commits suicide out of "shame". Gandhi also waged a war against contraceptives, labelling Indian women who used them as whores. But Gandhi was also a puritan and a misogynist who helped ensure that India remains one of the most sexually repressed nations on earth – and, by and large, a dreadful place to be born female. George Orwell, in his 1949 essay Reflections on Gandhi, said that "saints should always be judged guilty until they are proved innocent."

What a guy...

Good day.

Reply Original comment

HaloINSummer 10 years ago

to Thelambofdeth : Or perhaps Violence is more a part of our species than we care to acknowledge? You claim these fantasies or exteme and unrealistic, but widen your gaze for a moment. Up until this past century, Murdering was legal. If a man was disrespected, it was his right to fight a duel against the other man. There were rules and judges and was considered very civilized. In our society which still is completely dependent upon the threat of violence to exist(and where honor and esteem is bestowed upon the most effective murderers in history...the executives and senators and shareholders of the military-industrial complex), In less than 5 generations both men and women have lost a definitive role or purpose in life and are marketed mostly obsolete ideals about marriage and family and distracted with complaining about shit they don't even understand. The reason violent male dominating porn is popular is because that's how we must have evolved. Watching everybody else fucking each other. Consider this...Men are more visually stimulated sexually than women meaning that watching people fuck gets us going more than women. From an evolutionary standpoint this makes sense perhaps as males would watch other males gang banging(lets face it the female sexual capabilities are 20x that of the males in humans) there was likely a higher number of males than females engaging. While the younger males more likely than not would stay back and masturbate. Consider how Primates behave in regards to an alpha male. the younger males gradually become more and more bold. On the other hand the younger females are generally responsible for maintaining the young and teaching. Sounding alarms and gathering food. Look this next statement is not meant to be upseting, but it is inflammatory. (most people are not Hyperboreans "for we few know how remote our place is";) Everyone living is the descendent of a rapist. You have an ancestor who murdered all day then slept like a baby. Now regarding "Patriarchy" as if it somehow a construct of men as a whole is as silly as blaming the moon for the sunrise....That being said it does have an impact on our sexual ideals. Considering the subjugation of women in western culture finds its roots in ancient Egypt(Ironically amongst a group of men and women who were all slaves) . When the Jews(the only culture in history to have answered thus) faced the question "to be or not to be" they chose To Be at any Cost. And that cost has been substantial. Human beings are not a species evolved for subjugation and to suffer in captivity has rotted mankind, like the Orcas Dorsal Fin folds over. Sadly, an Alpha Male as a slave is still going to dominate and engage in conflict, or at least internally. The hatred for the masters without an outlet gave rise to the Alphas finding a new form of Dominating. The Rabbi's became the slave royalty, dominating and developing the traditions that gave them absolute power in every aspect of life from birth to death to having to inspect all the food that was to be eaten(bet they got the choice picks too)Now, here is the master stroke! As they dominate their people(no women rabbis or clergy exist) and promote a morality that poisons humans natural state as well as contradicts their own history and culture of the great warrior kings of Israel the demonizing of the woman gives every slave male a slave of there own. Adam(man) gave a rib for Eve(woman) to exists and that wasn't good enough for her. Eve(woman) disobeyed god(Rabbis) and was seeking truth from the tree of knowledge of good(rabbis) and evil(women) Not following the rabbis orders resulted in expulsion from paradise blah blah blah and it was all a woman at fault. Slave Morality is a profound condition for the individual, but since the ancient Rabbis took there place as the Original Patriarchs by creating a canon(religious doctrine) that . Please note that there are not any Female Rabbis... first turned the anger and hatred for the master towards the woman and likened them to serpents. Fast forward 2 thousand years and you have a revolutionary who doesn't believe in the need to be a slave and shakes things up a bit...but, well the intentions of the Nazarene may have been noble (or he just may have been nuts, but when Gandhi did it 2,000 years later it worked better) but the actual impact of his legend are all around us. The Roman Empires ability to rule was failing but they realized they just needed to use fear and promises of a magic place you get to go if your completely subservient your whole life(Muhammad definitely took the best tactics from the church for his cult, but he brought the fucking and the murdering back from the old testament that everyone missed so much)and Women.... now you were in trouble. The real shame to me is Men and Women are not meant to compete. Men are to compete with men and women are to compete with women for mating purposes. But divide and conquer is a powerful strategy, at its height the negro slaves in America outnumbered the whites 5 to 1. 5 to 1. Nat Turner killed some white people.....one guy? once? And here we are today at the most amazing point in the history of our species. Every single adverse condition ever faced by our ancestors is faster and faster becoming shit that defined us but that we don't know anything about. Because the slave morality still has its choke hold firmly in place. Victim mentality. Appealing to a moral high ground. Commenting on the injustice suffered at the hands of useless men and their lack of respect for a feminists right to be a delusional elitist with a god complex and a quick wit. Your young though, start forgetting you know everything and hopefully your intelligence will guide you too accepting yourself. It's not men who need to change anything. It's not women who need to change anything. It's just you. and it's just me. and it's just those people over there. but any perspective that just bitches about thousands of years of social functioning cause they have personal shortcomings and haven't gained the courage to face themselves so they are crusaders for equality (equality is a evil thing, perhaps the single most unnatural concept that has ever taken a foothold) ) because instead of going harder and demonstrating through actions that they are superior its much safer to know it in theory and preach nonsensical hate..... It's normal to care, to yearn for acceptance and ultimately to have another consciousness understand what its like to exist and confirm and validate ourselves externally. however its temporal, fleeting and generally leads to more doubt than before the connection happened. And I in no way lack respect for you, or our perspectives. I see someone who has a fire burning, fan the flames and find a focus for them. -Amor Fati

Reply Original comment

drchuck 10 years ago

to Thelambofdeth : i was being a bit hyperbolic i suppose. still when you mentioned metart i went back and looked at the site and i did find a little hetero material but the large majority of their offerings seem to be in the lesbian genre which corresponds to what i had remembered from previous drive-bys. otoh, i had not run across nubile films before and they seem to have several b/g movies that might have some promise for someone whose tastes run towards that. i appreciate the tip.

Reply Original comment

Thelambofdeth Publisher 10 years ago

to drchuck : Does it surprise me? lolno. Look at all the recent sports stuff with how rampant domestic violence is. Movies, rap(and some other) music, etc...there's an underlying subculture out there who feed off of debasing and abusing women. Of COURSE porn is going to reflect that.

Well here's the thing...I don't even watch b/g porn and I for a fact there is sensual b/g stuff out there. Many of the sites that makes a lot of the alternative g/g stuff like Metart, Sexart, Nubilefilms, MOM, etc produce hetero porn as well...but that's not what majority of consumers want. If the lion's share of the market didn't support the demonstrative, dehumanizing, degradation that passes for "sex", it wouldn't continually be made. It's only a reflection of what men(and some women) seem to prefer and desire. It doesn't seem to be about pleasure so much as it's about depicting the rather extreme and unrealistic fantasies some men want but can't obtain IRL so the tone is pushed to the 9th degress.

People (by in-large) don't want slow, intimate, and passionate sex. No, no, no. They can find that at home.(or on a street-corner) No they want gaping prolapsing assholes, and ten man bukkake gangbangs, and chained, forced deep-throats over a toilet seat and rape-simulations. So women are treated like glorified fuck orifices who's only purpose is to serve. Supply and demand for a gloriously desensitized crowd. Luckily I don't watch that crap, so it ain't my problem.

Reply Original comment

Thelambofdeth Publisher 10 years ago

Well nah, that's just a gross exaggeration, but it feels like it at times...

Also, seriously....if you don't want gay guys sending you invites, why is it ok for you men to invite lesbians? Some of us feel EXACTLY same way about men as you lot do about gay guys and MANY of us make it clear we're not "into that", either.

Thelambofdeth Publisher 10 years ago

I thought you hated it, sis?

Thelambofdeth Publisher 10 years ago

to _valerie_ : Yippe!

Reply Original comment

Thelambofdeth Publisher 10 years ago

to Dark_Witch : YAY!

Reply Original comment

drchuck 10 years ago

i really don't intend to stalk your posts, it's just that you have a clear and consistent point of view, obvious intelligence, and a remarkable facility for expressing yourself. i've definitely wondered about the phenomenon you discuss here. i myself have drifted over time away from the vast majority of heterosexual porn because of the power relationships it depicts and the way they are depicted. if you compare a g/g scene to a b/g scene with one of the same actresses the differences are stark. in the g/g scene both participants are portrayed as giving and receiving pleasure, usually multiple times and in multiple ways. in the b/g scene you know there's going to be a blowjob and often a gagging blowjob, if there's any cunnilingus it is brief and perfunctory, and then if there isn't an anal attack the woman is positioned in such a way that the clitoris couldn't be stimulated if you wanted it to be. there's just no beauty to it. even gay male porn has more tenderness and reciprocation of pleasure than that. of course being cheerfully bisexual widens the range of what i find erotically enjoyable but honestly, you would think that there might be a market somewhere for hetero porn with similar aesthetics to lesbian porn. i know you wouldn't be interested in it yourself but doesn't it surprise you at least a little bit that there isn't more of a market for that?

i look forward to reading more of your posts.

_valerie_ 10 years ago

me too x

Dark_Witch 10 years ago

I heart you.