Taking it from behind.

Here's a question. What's the difference between us girlies' bottoms and those of real Ladies?? Having enjoyed plenty of chums up my bum over the years, I thoroughly enjoy watching chums, whether gay or tranny, enjoying anal as well as the Ladies (particularly them taking BBC). Now, the one thing I've noticed after much 'research', is that us girlies seem to be able to take a full length in one go, while a smile and a moan of pleasure, while the Ladies always seem to find it painful and grimace and scream when even just the helmet goes in. Thay never seem to enjoy it nearly as much as us!!
So, the question is, do all us girlies have looser anal sphincters the the Ladies, and so can take even the largest clitty up the chuff, or are the Ladies playing games?? I have long understood, from chatting to Ladies, that most of them actually prefer anal and a reach-round to frig their clitties, than 'straight' penetration, with its risk of disease and pregnancy.
What do my chums out in xHamsterland think, are we easier to fuck than the Ladies, or do we just accept their games and get on and enjoy ourselves up their bottoms?? All comments are of interest!

Published by Hotlips001

4 years ago

Comments

Please or to post comments

Pantylovingbuckeye 3 years ago

I have known several females who much preferred anal to vaginal. I’ve known others who would wince and scream if a finger invaded that tight hole. I never understood either, my boy pussy can take the largest cocks without complaint.

Hotlips001 Publisher 4 years ago

to peeteerpan : Stuff 'research purposes'.....do it to enjoy!! I fully agree that I enjoy the far more feminine role in missionary, I'm certain it's far more like a woman being penetrated. I love the ability to hold my partner tight to me as he thrusts away, legs wrapped round his humping bum, your cock squeezed between you like a hard clitty, his chest rubbing your nipples and the kissing!! You'll definitely get to think as well as feel like a woman, especially as his thrusts rub your prostate to lengthy orgasms (hence the rubbing of my cock between us too!). I had one partner who liked missionary because it reminded him of his ex-wife, and he was able to arouse me to simultaneous prostate and penile orgasm, and even on one occasion even his cum! Now that was an amazing experience, both of us spurting spunk while I also shuddered though a prostate cum too! Don't expe t too much first time, unless your partner is used to missionary, but pretty soon, you'll be begging for it whenever you can (Of course, you'll still be able to enjoy a quick doggy when necessary!!) Let me know how you get on!!!

Reply Original comment

to Hotlips001 : Lovely reply, thanks for your insight. I have wondered what the difference would feel like between front and rear entry. When my lover had me doggy it was out of this world. I had always wondered from a young age what sex must feel like for girls. Certainly what I felt was totally new and incredibly more stimulating than a normal m/f fuck, an orgasm that was very intense and went on and on and on and had me screaming like a woman. Him cumming inside me was something I felt I had to have and psychologically it sent me up to an even higher level. Afterwards I had an afterglow and loved the fact I had his cum inside me at both ends. I think I achieved my ambition of knowing what it must be like for girls.Next stop missionary, for research purposes of course

Reply Original comment

Hotlips001 Publisher 4 years ago

to peeteerpan : I quite agree, I much prefer missionary when time and place allows!! But I'm willing to take it doggy if necessary! I find my chums 'hit the target'of my prostate with their helmet more easily doggy, bringing me to climax quicker, whereas their shaft rubs my prostate missionary leading to a longer build up to a more intense prostate cum. I also find it nicer to rub my (very) erect penis between our tummies in missionary, rather than relying on the chum having enough control to cope with giving a reach-round while thrusting!! Interesting your views on the difference between tarts and chums when it comes to anal. I haven't had many ladies anally and usually have my mind on other things as I penetrate. My comments are more vased on the photos on xHamster. As you may have noted by my otger posts, I've been up lads tradesmens from my earliest arousals, and yes, we didn't know about lube, but still managed to penetrate easily; in later days, I believe having a willing partner reduces stresss levels and eases entry. Obviously we need more research!!!

Reply Original comment

Interestingly enough, I have found the complete opposite. I "broke in" five ladies and despite having a rather thick cock, they all took me relatively painlessly whereas the two girlies I've had, who were both experienced, required patience and lots of lube. I've only really had one cock properly and he had to be very patient with me. He was a darling though and fucked me to multiple orgasms which was heavenly. My ambition is to be in the missionary next time, I want to wrap my legs around him and feel even more like a girlie