Why do I publish mainly 69 vids?
Two points:
1 - I like that, a lot! And I think I'm not the only one.
2 - There's a very simple problem with "69" and porn search engines: "69" is a 2 (two) character word. If, as an database administrator, you setup your system to index all two characters word, your database is going to *explode* in size and CPU consumption - hence you don't. The MySQL popular database engine (probably used by most site) does not, by default, index 2 characters stuff. It did to be rebuilt from source code to do so, the kind of stuff sysadmin don't do. What does this all mean? It means 69 stuff is simply *not indexed at all*. As a result: not available. Too bad.
And that's why I decided to register as a XH user: to post those invisible, below the radar 69[*]. If I could, I'd post my yeeeeeeeeears long collection of 69 pics and vids for all the giver/receiver oral lovers. Which I'll try to do, bit after bit.
*: Yet know what? I do not like *only* 69.
1 - I like that, a lot! And I think I'm not the only one.
2 - There's a very simple problem with "69" and porn search engines: "69" is a 2 (two) character word. If, as an database administrator, you setup your system to index all two characters word, your database is going to *explode* in size and CPU consumption - hence you don't. The MySQL popular database engine (probably used by most site) does not, by default, index 2 characters stuff. It did to be rebuilt from source code to do so, the kind of stuff sysadmin don't do. What does this all mean? It means 69 stuff is simply *not indexed at all*. As a result: not available. Too bad.
And that's why I decided to register as a XH user: to post those invisible, below the radar 69[*]. If I could, I'd post my yeeeeeeeeears long collection of 69 pics and vids for all the giver/receiver oral lovers. Which I'll try to do, bit after bit.
*: Yet know what? I do not like *only* 69.
10 lata/lat temu
