Really!?!?! . . . Benevolent Sexism

A few months back I learned that MetLife has instituted a policy to encourage sex equality.

Their human resource (HR) "honchos" have set out a list of rules that must be obeyed under pain of some sort of discipline.
* Men must not hold doors for women.
* Men must not wait for women to pass in front of them.
* Men must not wait to let women on an elevator first; nor may they wait for women to exit the elevator first.
[/i]

I imagine that a tip of the hat or removing a hat while talking with a woman on the street is no longer allowed. But then men are not taught these things anymore are they.

So I wasn't too surprised recently when I heard a report that the "English manglers" had invented a new word for "chivalry." Now we are supposed to call this behavior "Benevolent Sexism." To me that's astounding.

Are we so ignorant of our own language? Is it acceptable that not knowing of a perfectly fine word gives one license to make up a new one?

The word chivalry comes out of the middle ages when a whole code of ethics developed around the proper treatment of others especially women. It has held for hundreds of years with little change.

The report did say that the country wants to get back to accepting more chivalrous . . . excuse me . . . Benevolent Sexist behavior. So that's good. I'm all for the fair sex getting equal pay for the same work. But MetLife, your HR people are taking themselves way too seriously!

Cheers!
BL
Published by beardedlion
12 years ago
Comments
5
Please or to post comments
beardedlion Publisher 6 years ago
Well if that works for you . . .
Reply
johnr68
johnr68 11 years ago
Most of this stuff is made up when the news people run out of things to report. I hold doors open for men and women. It's not sexist to give up your seat on the train for a pregnant woman. I live by the 'don't be a dick' rulebook.
Reply
madjack666
madjack666 12 years ago
Great post. I've gone through this bullshit where I work as well. I do my part to subvert this PC nonsense by holding the door for everyone, saying, "No, after you..." to whomever is standing next to me when the elevator doors open. I would welcome a challenge from any HR or PC motherfucker in any of these circumstances, and in fact have enjoyed holding the door for them especially when the opportunity arises.

I've been doing this for many years now, and I can't count the times that women have commented, "I guess chivalry isn't dead after all".

Again, excellent post. Keep up the good work!

Jack
Reply
beardedlion Publisher 12 years ago
As do I. If she is qualified, she must get the same pay as he; no question. I suspect that this PC business is set out intentionally by those who think the general staff is not as smart as they; that these underlings will miss that fact that the pay scales remain the same.
Reply
biorgium
biorgium 12 years ago
I'm generally supportive of feminism, but this policy is the kind of OTT PC overkill that gives feminism a bad name.
Reply